Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bob's avatar

Yes, our efforts to preserve and conserve our natural resources in the Adirondack Park are flawed and subject to criticism. But they are no more flawed than the desire of private interests to abuse and misuse those very same natural resources.

Given the nature of public and private interests in our country, we’ll always have tension between those advocating the development of our natural resources for private gain and those advocating the preservation and conservation of those resources for public use. And we’ll always have a debate over the form and substance of private gain verses preservation.

The forces for private gain are strong. In order to preserve and conserve our natural resources in the Adirondack Park, we need a strong counter-balance. I’m grateful that the Adirondack Park Agency exists as a means to protect the natural resources of the Adirondack Park and as a counter-balance to the forces of private gain.

Expand full comment
Tanya Goldstein's avatar

I’m just wondering if a developer from Texas understands that a golf course in the Adirondacks will be unusable at least 6 months out of the year, if not more, considering mud season and blackfly season…Or is he counting on climate change to do away with winter? It has been trending that way. As long as the Park regulations are followed and some thought is given to planning the hotel and homes so as to do as little disturbance as possible, the money and jobs will be a boon to the area. It may not be untouched wilderness, but I notice in the little hamlet that I live in that the houses and roads do not seem to be completely deterring the local wildlife. We have bears, deer, foxes, raccoons, possums, rabbits, turkeys, songbirds…Some animals do better in habitat with edges and fields instead of unbroken climax forest.

Expand full comment
66 more comments...

No posts