Discussion about this post

User's avatar
mike parwana's avatar

If you want to end divisiveness you shouldn’t jump right into highly charged subjects like … ( wait for it) … the weather.

I’ve been having the same problem running out of newspaper with the woodstove at our shop. Mostly it seems like the paper is much thinner, but also we miss a delivery about one day a week. I don’t know if that is a business strategy to randomly wean us away from reading the paper in hard copy. In a pinch I’ll get a copy of the Chronicle to start my fire but I check who may be nearby when I pick it up so that nobody I know sees me pick it up.

Anyway, it looks like we’ll burn exactly a cord of seasoned hardwood this year which is maybe 10-15% less than usual. There is a more scientific way to judge the season. In the weather section of the PS there are statistics for Heating Degree Days which gives month and year to date numbers and the “normal” to compare it to. As of Sunday we had 5338 HDD compared to a “normal” of 6055, which is 717, or 11.8% fewer HDD than “normal” which is the average of the last 30 years. The insidious thing is that the “normal” gets updated periodically and as the climate gets warmer the “normal” goes up. So while we may be 11.8% warmer than todays normal we might be 15% or 18% warmer than 30 or 40 years ago. I don’t have that older info at my fingertips so I made up those numbers for illustration, but they’re probably not far off.

Climate is a touchy issue. I remember my boss at a local home panelization business saying “we won’t have to worry about that for 100 years.” I asked him if he had grandchildren. He didn’t fire me, actually, he thought about it and commented about it a day or 2 later. That was about 37 years ago and we’re worrying. So here’s the political part: Jimmy Carter tried to get us to wean ourselves from overconsumption, instituted CAFE standards on autos, put solar panels on the White House. Reagan derided him for instituting a nanny state and ripped the solar panels down, not to be replaced. Current news indicates the rumors of Reagan colluding with Iran to get elected may be true. In 2000 Al Gore won the popular vote but SCOTUS essentially gave the election to GWB over 500+/- votes in FL. And in 2016 Hillary won the popular vote but lost to Trump. Each of these elections had historic implications on our ability to manage our energy consumption and conservation policies, and every 4 - 8 years we lost that much more time to make small adjustments to our lifestyles. (Giving credit where due GWB signed the legislation eliminating wasteful incandescent lightbulbs, but GOP blames that on Obama) So now we are seeing the clear evidence of climate change in our daily lives along with the devastating and expensive effects of more powerful storms, sea level rise, etc. The changes we need to make now are far more drastic and expensive. These costs are disruptive and they are behind a lot displaced of political anger. People who called themselves “fiscal conservatives” are the ones who pushed costs onto future generations and just like compound interest the costs have compounded. The “fiscal conservatives” were the ones arguing against setting gas mileage standards for autos - standards that saved individuals and collectively the whole country. Maybe we need to stop listening to the “fiscal conservatives” because they cost us the most.

Expand full comment
Barbara Sealy's avatar

I think this is great-please let us know how it goes!

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts