Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Irene Baldwin's avatar

Honestly. It doesn't help that this current Supreme Court overturned Roe. Precedent is a bedrock principle in our system, and when a panel of judges just chooses to ignore it so dramatically, you do wonder whether judges are following the law or their own agenda. I'm not saying all judges or even most (or even many) are like this, but mud splatters and, when the highest court in the land is biased, it undermines faith in the entire system.

Expand full comment
Barbara Sealy's avatar

We have seen Trump set up the Supreme Court to do his bidding and this has contributed to many concerns regarding the judicial system. My gosh, RBG wasn’t even cold and Trump had her replaced but the republicans refused to allow Garland an opportunity because it was within an election year. I can’t even begin with Clarence Thomas and his wife. We have Cannon who clearly is assisting Trump and her husband’s association with the party should have disqualified her immediately. Trump threatens( or has his crew threaten) judges when they attempt to hold him accountable. He knows that there is some crazy follower out there that will do his dirty work for him. The thing I don’t understand is why these judges don’t have something that can trace these calls and respond by putting these people in prison. Seems so simple to me but I’m limited technologically. Is this the new freedom? Freedom to threaten the lives of others with no consequences?

Expand full comment
60 more comments...

No posts